<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for my zombie plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibl.org/~sweda/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibl.org/~sweda</link>
	<description>you have a zombie plan, right?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:22:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on IBL Game FAQ by Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.ibl.org/~sweda/iblgame/faq/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibl.org/~sweda/?page_id=40#comment-12</guid>
		<description>This is something that is done to assist IBL owners.  Players who have their position listed in upper case played in 24+ games at that position in the previous MLB season.  This is important because that is the cutoff for being eligible to start at that position in the playoffs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is something that is done to assist IBL owners.  Players who have their position listed in upper case played in 24+ games at that position in the previous MLB season.  This is important because that is the cutoff for being eligible to start at that position in the playoffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IBL Game FAQ by Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.ibl.org/~sweda/iblgame/faq/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibl.org/~sweda/?page_id=40#comment-11</guid>
		<description>The charts are correct, you may only bunt for a base hit with the bases empty.  Therefore, all bunts with men on base are considered sacrifice attempts.  When I re-designed the bunting system I must have forgotten to update the instructions accordingly.  I&#039;ll update the instructions.

Regarding holding runners, it is the intention of the rules that this be limited only to holding the runner at third.  This is so that the offensive manager is not required to put the squeeze play on with a runner on third.  All other baserunners should be considered in motion on a bunt.

In general I think one of the problems you run into when simulating a game like baseball is that if you try to keep your charts simple you unfortunately end up with ambiguous resolution in certain situations.  In order to account for every possible base/out situation it would require much more text than is feasible given the space constraints.  I&#039;m thinking it might be useful to start a page on the Wiki to document some of the rulings the IBL has passed to deal with these situations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The charts are correct, you may only bunt for a base hit with the bases empty.  Therefore, all bunts with men on base are considered sacrifice attempts.  When I re-designed the bunting system I must have forgotten to update the instructions accordingly.  I&#8217;ll update the instructions.</p>
<p>Regarding holding runners, it is the intention of the rules that this be limited only to holding the runner at third.  This is so that the offensive manager is not required to put the squeeze play on with a runner on third.  All other baserunners should be considered in motion on a bunt.</p>
<p>In general I think one of the problems you run into when simulating a game like baseball is that if you try to keep your charts simple you unfortunately end up with ambiguous resolution in certain situations.  In order to account for every possible base/out situation it would require much more text than is feasible given the space constraints.  I&#8217;m thinking it might be useful to start a page on the Wiki to document some of the rulings the IBL has passed to deal with these situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IBL Game FAQ by Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.ibl.org/~sweda/iblgame/faq/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibl.org/~sweda/?page_id=40#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Okay, hopefully my last question:  does case mean anything on a batter&#039;s card when the positions he plays are listed?  For example, is there a difference between SS and ss?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, hopefully my last question:  does case mean anything on a batter&#8217;s card when the positions he plays are listed?  For example, is there a difference between SS and ss?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IBL Game FAQ by Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.ibl.org/~sweda/iblgame/faq/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibl.org/~sweda/?page_id=40#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your reply to my previous question.  It really helped.

Now I am confused by bunting.

In the playing instructions it says that with men on base, the manager can declare if the bunt is a sacrifice or for a base hit.  But in the charts, it says that with men on base, all bunts are sacrifices.  Which one is right?

What is the definition of each term?  I guess if all the runners are holding, the bunt is for a base hit, otherwise it is for a sacrifice.  

Also in the instructions, it says that with men on first and third, the manager can hold the runner on third.  In the chart, there are no restrictions, suggesting that the runner on third can be held at other times, such as if there is only a runner on third.  Can he be held, while the batter tries for a base hit?

And what about other bases?  If there is only a batter on second, can he be held while the batter tries to bunt for a base hit?

Thanks again for your help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your reply to my previous question.  It really helped.</p>
<p>Now I am confused by bunting.</p>
<p>In the playing instructions it says that with men on base, the manager can declare if the bunt is a sacrifice or for a base hit.  But in the charts, it says that with men on base, all bunts are sacrifices.  Which one is right?</p>
<p>What is the definition of each term?  I guess if all the runners are holding, the bunt is for a base hit, otherwise it is for a sacrifice.  </p>
<p>Also in the instructions, it says that with men on first and third, the manager can hold the runner on third.  In the chart, there are no restrictions, suggesting that the runner on third can be held at other times, such as if there is only a runner on third.  Can he be held, while the batter tries for a base hit?</p>
<p>And what about other bases?  If there is only a batter on second, can he be held while the batter tries to bunt for a base hit?</p>
<p>Thanks again for your help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IBL Game FAQ by Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.ibl.org/~sweda/iblgame/faq/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibl.org/~sweda/?page_id=40#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I thought we had the clutch definition in the playing instructions, but they do not appear to be there.  I believe the original PtP rules defined a clutch situation like this:

- prior to the 7th inning, two outs with a runner in scoring position and the batting team tied or behind by 1 run

- 7th inning or later, tying or go-ahead run is on base, at bat, or on deck

We no longer assign clutch ratings but we haven&#039;t removed the references from the charts in case we bring them back.  Clutch ratings were removed because the PtP system did not properly balance the batting &amp; pitching adjustments nor did it adjust the cards for non-clutch opportunities (if a player is better than his overall stats in a clutch situation he should be worse in non-clutch).

Regarding your IBL question, we have a few associates but they are generally people who do not have enough time to run a team.  If you become an associate with the intention of becoming a full-time owner it usually doesn&#039;t take long.  There&#039;s also the option of helping out an existing team by becoming a co-owner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought we had the clutch definition in the playing instructions, but they do not appear to be there.  I believe the original PtP rules defined a clutch situation like this:</p>
<p>- prior to the 7th inning, two outs with a runner in scoring position and the batting team tied or behind by 1 run</p>
<p>- 7th inning or later, tying or go-ahead run is on base, at bat, or on deck</p>
<p>We no longer assign clutch ratings but we haven&#8217;t removed the references from the charts in case we bring them back.  Clutch ratings were removed because the PtP system did not properly balance the batting &#038; pitching adjustments nor did it adjust the cards for non-clutch opportunities (if a player is better than his overall stats in a clutch situation he should be worse in non-clutch).</p>
<p>Regarding your IBL question, we have a few associates but they are generally people who do not have enough time to run a team.  If you become an associate with the intention of becoming a full-time owner it usually doesn&#8217;t take long.  There&#8217;s also the option of helping out an existing team by becoming a co-owner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IBL Game FAQ by Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.ibl.org/~sweda/iblgame/faq/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibl.org/~sweda/?page_id=40#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I am trying to learn how to play the game, after having been a Statis Pro junky for years.  I notice the charts refer to clutch situations, but I can&#039;t find the definition of a clutch situation anywhere.

Also, can you give an idea of the number of associats there are, how often owners give up a team and how long it might generally take to become an owner, as a dedicated associate?

Thanks for your time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to learn how to play the game, after having been a Statis Pro junky for years.  I notice the charts refer to clutch situations, but I can&#8217;t find the definition of a clutch situation anywhere.</p>
<p>Also, can you give an idea of the number of associats there are, how often owners give up a team and how long it might generally take to become an owner, as a dedicated associate?</p>
<p>Thanks for your time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on range rating adjustments by Lex Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.ibl.org/~sweda/2009/12/range-rating-adjustments/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 01:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibl.org/~sweda/?p=119#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Awesome stuff, thank you very much for posting. I love the work you do and the IBL Game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome stuff, thank you very much for posting. I love the work you do and the IBL Game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on range rating adjustments by Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.ibl.org/~sweda/2009/12/range-rating-adjustments/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibl.org/~sweda/?p=119#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s an example of the good defense bonus, using Endy Chavez from the 2009 card set: 

Chavez recorded a raw range rating of 12 in 197 innings in LF, 1 in 38 innings in CF, and 14 in 400 innings in RF.  Chavez received a +1 bonus in LF and CF because of the 400 innings in RF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an example of the good defense bonus, using Endy Chavez from the 2009 card set: </p>
<p>Chavez recorded a raw range rating of 12 in 197 innings in LF, 1 in 38 innings in CF, and 14 in 400 innings in RF.  Chavez received a +1 bonus in LF and CF because of the 400 innings in RF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IBL Game FAQ by Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.ibl.org/~sweda/iblgame/faq/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibl.org/~sweda/?page_id=40#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your interest in the game.  I figure a good way to grow this FAQ is to answer questions here in the comments section, so fire away!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your interest in the game.  I figure a good way to grow this FAQ is to answer questions here in the comments section, so fire away!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
